USG Funding Meetings in D.C. on 10/27
by Eric · 69 things on Twos
- [These are EGK’s notes of the meetings; however, it wasn’t made clear to me beforehand that I was the “scribe” (vs. McKeon), so they may not be complete.]
- Meeting with Dr. Michienzi, CTO to the Assistant SOD for Industrial Base Policy, at Pentagon (on phone were Matt Kay, ? …):
- [NH presented]
- Dr. M acknowledged need for packages
- First topic was HDBU
- Re IBAS, need to get with Adelle Ratcliff, who has $ now for “secure packaging”; Matt Walsh and Donna Joyce are also key; work with Mr. James (?) who works with Ms. Ratcliff; Dr. M will connect us with the attendees on the phone
- Dr. M acknowledged the significant gap associated with organic substrates
- Dr. M stated that the DOD’s aggregated demand is unknown as the service arms essentially operate as silos
- Mr. Kay asked whether the SD ceramic capabilities (re line spacing and pitch, 2-3 tier packages) are not equivalent to what is in Japan in terms of yield and maturity? NH said we have a new line that is SOTA installed 1 year ago; as such, SD’s capabilities equal those of Japan; it was agreed to take this discussion off-line
- NH stated that KII’s intention is a copy exact line
- Second topic was rad hard and an investment to expand SD’s current line to establish capacity
- There was discussion regarding 50 micron spacing for this line
- NH was asked whether we do classified work with a separate organization; Dr. M stated there is “significant demand” for such work
- Dr. M talked about the possibility of a Corporate Research and Development Agreement, by which KII could get sponsored for such work for secure packaging capabilities
- NH asked about other funding sources for KII’s requests; Dr. M suggested 4: 1) IBAS (which she described as “front end”); 2) DPA III (which she describes as “product level”); 3) CHIPS Act; and 4) Steampipe, which is associated with NSTL (?); both IBAS and DPA III have inherent assumptions of cost sharing by KII
- There was discussion regarding the DPA III white paper; Dr. Kay (?) asked whether KII has submitted a DPA III white paper for rad hard; NH said KII has, which is not correct; however, we were able to clarify this in the meeting; KII is committed to submitting the paper in the near future
- KII was encouraged to emphasize it’s support of the DOD first, followed by added support for commercial market; Dr. M liked that KII’s priority is to support the DOD first, commercial market second
- The RFP for rad hard is still expected in November
- The DOC will be releasing info re CA funding in the near future
- Set up meeting with Adelle Ratcliff!
- Meeting with Anderson Helton, Legislative Fellow, Sebastian Paez, Research Assistant, and Andrew Bichlmeier, Legislative Fellow, all Senator Wicker (R- MI, RM on Commerce and Technology, SASC) staffers
- [NH presented]
- Acknowledged that solving the problem of over-dependence on Asia for chips will not solve the problem of complete dependence on Asia for packages; this is a critical issue
- They were unfamiliar with the IPC report, which we should send (Note: we should send to all as a matter of routine follow-up)
- They committed to connecting us with right people in DOC; they also will look into getting KII a spot on the CA committee
- Others to potentially contact for support include: 1) Dan Cheever, LA in Todd Young’s office; 2) Senator Cantwell’s team (which sometimes proves to be unresponsive); 3) and Senator Cruz’s office, as he’s on the Commerce Committee (in particular, Duncan Rankin (?)); they can all potentially help with the Commerce Committee
- They asked about KII’s $91M ask for HDBU and whether KII is willing to cost share
- They suggested trying to approach Undersecretary La Plant may not make the most sense and that the people under him would be better contacts for topic such as munitions, chips/packages and rare earth minerals
- Meeting with Michael McKay, who is on Representative Calvert’s (R- __, RM on DOD Appropriations) staff
- [NH presented]
- Mr. McKay asked whether KII is seeking $ through IBAS; he noted that the key person for such funding is Adelle Ratcliff
- He acknowledged that packaging needs to be on shored and Calvert supports this initiative
- He suggested focusing on current PEs and the people running them, as such $ is already appropriated
- Focus on the PE program managers and defense appropriations bills
- He analogized the packaging situation to that of the rare earth minerals situation and suggested we familiarize ourselves on how the latter issue has been addressed
- KII offered to host a visit by Rep Calvert
- Meeting with Justin Schardin (LA), Jenna XX (Team Defense/Defense Appropriations) and Charlie XX (Economic Analyst) of Senator Feinstein’s (D-CA) staff
- [NH presented]
- NH discussed the differences between ceramic and organic packages and that shrinking chips are forcing the organic path
- The team seemed more engaged and were interested in visiting KII
- They were unfamiliar with the IPC report and KII should send (Note: this should happen as matter of course)
- NH mentioned that only .01% of demand for packages is military related
- They asked whether KII understood that any funding would likely require an investment from KII as this is a public/private opportunity; KII said it understood this and NH outlined what we would invest; NH made the point that Dr. Honey mentioned that DOD thinks that foreign “partnerships” are necessary (??)
- They suggested reviewing Chips.gov and connecting with the people behind it
- When asked about other funding routes, they suggested IBAS for equipment and DPA III; they offered to give support letters, as necessary
- Regarding jobs, NH mentioned the plan is to move current, highly skilled workers into organic and back fill, as necessary
- They mentioned that on the appropriations side, certain PEs may be applicable now; they asked us to share info re any PEs we’re familiar with
- NH mentioned the rad hard request as well, which is intended to buy equipment to increase capacity, which also supports the DOD
- KII action item: to let this team know what to put into a letter to support KII in the DOC
- Meeting with Evan Viau of Representative McMorris Roger’s (R-__, RM on Energy and Commerce) staff
- [NH presented]
- Evan conceded he’s the wrong person for DOC purposes but will connect us with the right people (out of town)
- He is the right person re E & C and will support KII here
- NH mentioned we have the technology (some of which came from IBM) and we’re ready to transfer it if we can get funding
- Evan mentioned subcommittees at DOC and certain people associated with them including: 1) Consumer Protection and Commerce (?) - Tim Kirth (?) and Brandon Raus (?); and 2) Science (no name).
- Evan mentioned Senator Shumer’s SB 1571 as a source of funding?; need to look into this
- He questioned the “allocation” of any investment between USG funds and KII; NH mentioned a $91M/$31M “split”
- He mentioned contacting Peter Spencer on the Energy team who is interested in organic packages for supercomputers
- Meeting with Adam Taylor, MLA of Representative Peters’ (D-CA) staff
- [NH presented]
- Adam had questions about how much money KII was requesting; when $91M was mentioned, he reacted it is a big ask; however, when it was mentioned that the CA has $5B for packaging alone, he seemed better with the amount
- He asked about KII’s investment for HDBU and NH mentioned $30M; NH mentioned there’s a 2-year backlog for equipment
- To Adam’s related question, NH mentioned that the “sustainment” amounts include training for labor
- To Adam’s related question, NH mentioned that if KII established the HDBU line, KII could have prototypes after 14 months, volume production in 3 years
- In terms of people to connect with, Adam mentioned IBAS, Dr. Honey, Dr. Shenoy, and Dr. Michienzi
- He said he would be willing to support letters of recommendation for DPA III, and with individual PEs
- When NH mentioned others had mentioned Adelle Ratcliff, Adam said she’s a “rock star,” that he’s had prior conversations with her and she was unusually willing to speak with him, and that he would be happy to connect us with her
- He was open to a visit and getting Congressman Peters to visit as well.
- There was no meeting with Zac Cummins of Senator Padilla’s (D-CA) staff